| Subject: |
|
Predictions of evolution don't produce reality |
| Name: |
|
who is your creator |
| Date Posted: |
|
Feb 26, 08 - 12:06 PM |
| IP Address: |
|
75.72.61.158 |
| Email: |
|
info@whoisyourcreator.com |
| Message: |
|
In regard to your comment:
"The cool thing is that with the knowledge of the PRINCIPLES involved (wind, snow, land formations) you can EXPECT a snow bank to turn up in any particular position with the given weather. It's the power of PREDICTION, and it can turn out to be right every time - not to mention, a pretty darn good EXPLANATION.
Evolution works in a very similar way."
Evolutionary Predictions
Principles:
All matter and life
Prediction:
All matter and life was created through random events without any supernatural means.
Explanation:
1. The creation of the universe (cosmology) is now off limits because evolutionists claim that it has nothing to do with evolution.
http://pub17.bravenet.com/forum/1424646898/fetch/704592/2
http://pub17.bravenet.com/forum/1424646898/fetch/705803/1
http://pub17.bravenet.com/forum/1424646898/fetch/707017/1
2. The creation of life (abiogenesis) is also off limits because evolutionists claim that it has nothing to do with evolution.
http://pub17.bravenet.com/forum/1424646898/fetch/704592/2
http://pub17.bravenet.com/forum/1424646898/fetch/705803/1
http://pub17.bravenet.com/forum/1424646898/fetch/707017/1
3. The creation of novel or more complex traits in organisms (macroevolution) cannot be explained or proven because evolutionists don't know how it works:
http://pub17.bravenet.com/forum/1424646898/fetch/748021
http://pub17.bravenet.com/forum/1424646898/fetch/747258/
http://pub17.bravenet.com/forum/1424646898/fetch/746941/
http://pub17.bravenet.com/forum/1424646898/fetch/730697
http://pub17.bravenet.com/forum/1424646898/fetch/730588
"Students should realize that although virtually all scientists accept the general concept of evolution of species, scientists do have different opinions on how fast and by what mechanisms evolution proceeds.”
The American Association for the Advancement of Science, Educational Benchmarks, (F) Evolution of Life
http://www.project2061.org/publications/bsl/online/ch5/ch5.htm#F
“Scientists are still uncovering the specifics of how, when, and why evolution produced the life we see on Earth today."
Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History
http://www.nmnh.si.edu/paleo/geotime/main/foundation_life3.html
“But they are trying to figure out how evolution happens, and that's not an easy job.”
University of California Museum of Paleontology and the National Center for Science Education
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/0_0_0/evo_50
"Precisely how and at what rates descent with modification occurs are areas of intense research. For example, much work is under way testing the significance of natural selection as the main driving force of evolution."
The American Geological Institute
http://www.agiweb.org/news/evolution/mechanismforchange.html
“There seems to be a striking commonality between all major transitions in the evolution of life. In each new class of biological objects, the principal types emerge abruptly, and intermediate grades (e.g., intermediates between the precellular stage of evolution and prokaryotic cells or between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells), typically, cannot be identified. The events that lead to the emergence of a new level of complexity and, obviously, are crucial in the evolution of life elude representation through a unique tree topology and are notoriously hard to reconstruct. Whatever trees have been constructed for these stages of life's history, have extremely short, most often, unreliable internal branches, and the tree topology tends to differ for different genes.”
The Biological Big Bang model for the major transitions in evolution, Eugene V Koonin, National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, in Biology Direct 2007, 2:21.
http://www.biology-direct.com/content/2/1/21
4. The fossil record does not reflect Darwinism:
“Most of the animal phyla that are represented in the fossil record first appear, ‘fully formed,’ in the Cambrian some 550 million years ago...The fossil record is therefore of no help with respect to the origin and early diversification of the various animal phyla."
Richard S K Barnes, Peter Calow, Peter J. W. Olive, David W. Golding and John Spicer, ‘The Invertebrates: A New Synthesis’ (textbook), Updated 2000, Blackwell Publishing
"To take a line of fossils and claim that they represent a lineage is not a scientific hypothesis that can be tested, but an assertion that carries the same validity as a bedtime story - amusing, perhaps even instructive, but not scientific."
Dr. Henry Gee, Ardent Evolutionist, Senior Editor, Biological Sciences for the journal Nature as written in his book, In Search of Deep Time: Beyond the Fossil Record to a New History of Life, New York, The Free Press, 1999, page 126-127.
5. Even evolutionists now doubt the 'randomness' of their own theory:
"In a Feb. 17, 2008 symposium at the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) annual meeting in Boston,* Miller will argue that science itself, including evolutionary biology, is predicated on the idea of "design" -- the correlation of structure with function that lies at heart of the molecular nature of life."
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/02/080217143838.htm
In regard to your other comment:
"You can't expect anyone to give the details you're asking for, they're just not known. However, be it known that it does NOTHING to belittle the ToE as it works and as it is SEEN to work in the real world."
We don't have to belittle evolution. You guys seem to do a mighty fine job all by yourself. |
|
Replies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
Forum
bravenet.com
