In regard to your comment:

"What mutations occurred can not be known for certain. So, contrary to your claim, it is difficult for someone to produce such evidence. However, it is clear that you are not interested in debate or understanding. Unfortunately for you, even if your opponents can't fulfill your unreasonable request, your case is still not made. And evolution is not weakened."

1. To clarify, are you claiming that it's "difficult" or "impossible"?

2. We're not asking for evidence, we're just asking that you provide a likely scenario that would prove evolution might be remotely possible.

3. Since it's "unreasonable" of us to ask that you devise a likely genetic scenario of ANY novel or more complex trait appearing ...
It's unreasonable to think anyone would believe it actually occurs.

4. We are giving you license to use fantasy within the bounds of known genetic capabilities, so just give it a shot, why don't you?


In regard to your other comment:

"This is just another silly exercise you engage in. Like deleting posts when someone gets the better of you or another creationist. Yes, you win for a time. But both you and I know that it is dishonest. We both know that you can't honestly examine the evidence, and that you have to stack the deck to protect your misunderstanding of evolution."

1. How very interesting that you call asking you to prove that evolution is genetically possible "silly."

2. A win?

3. Cheap shot, Arneson, about deleting the posts. You guys bicker like a bunch of school girls, and I'm embarrassed to leave them on this board.

3. Take the opportunity to stack your deck and do the scenario for everyone. It should be a cakewalk for you guys and think about how it would advance your case.