Yes, WiYC's arguments always comes back to misrepresentation ...
" 1. Please share with us your evidence of how modern man evolved from apes."
It is just like your billboards. You simply can't ever get aspect of evolution correct, if misrepresenting the theory better serves your purpose. Man and apes share a common ancestor.
Your source pointed to evidence of human evolution, and gave an indication of how it happened. It showed two species from the Homo genus both living in nearly the same time and place. They are neither anotomically modern humans, nor are they apes. Evolution provides an explanation for these facts.
How does creationsim explain the existence of these fossils? If you want creationism to be considered a theory, you must provide a creationist explanation that better explains the facts and conforms to the norms of science. This you and all creationists studiously avoid doing. Instead, you ignore the evidence which you yourself presented.