You ignore the evidence for human evolution that you yourself present.
" 1. Interesting 'evidence' you have for human origins. No comment."
You provided the proof of two separate species from the genus Homo that lived in proximity in terms of both time and place. Neither are Homo sapiens and conform to the predictions of the theory of evolution. How ironic and appropriate that a creationist offers no explanation for other humans that are both more primative and predate our species. That seems like the creationist tradition.
More ironic is that you seem to think somehow that it undermines evolution. This simply points to your lack of understanding of science in general and evolution in particular.