Who Is Your Creator message forum

Forum: Who Is Your Creator message forum

This forum is locked and posting is not allowed

Author

Comment

View Entire Thread

Arneson

Aug 28, 2007 - 10:33AM

71.63.223.195

There is one point that we can agree on...

However, I completely disagree with your position that evolution is not science.

Your point is not proven. - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 3:48am

Birds evolved from theropod dinosaurs. - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 4:15am

No contradiction if you follow the logic and the evidence. - by Arneson - Aug 27, 2007 10:31am

Pakicetus was terrestrial as expected in the first in the transition from land to sea. - by Arneson - Aug 27, 2007 10:52am

Which of Thewissen and Hussain's summary would you go by? 1993 or 2001? - by whoisyourcreator - Aug 27, 2007 9:10pm

The most current that shows terrestrial whale and completes the sequence. - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 9:59am

Thewissen and Hussain explained their 'change of mind'. - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 10:10am

WiYC carefully trims quotes to avoid the obvious whale evolution conclusion from the evidence. - by Arneson - Aug 27, 2007 11:25am

And your proof is where? - by whoisyourcreator - Aug 27, 2007 9:13pm

I think you would find it in the article from which you selectively quoted. - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 10:04am

Ears and foramen. - by Arneson - Aug 27, 2007 11:37am

Give your evidence of fat pad containment and explanation of development - by whoisyourcreator - Aug 27, 2007 12:01pm

Miraculous is your gig not mine. - by Arneson - Aug 27, 2007 12:29pm

Why is it that evolutionists cannot explain how evolution occurs? - by whoisyourcreator - Aug 27, 2007 8:49pm

Why is it WiYC always changes the subject? - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 5:28am

So you admit you are unable to articulate how evolution occurs? - by whoisyourcreator - Aug 28, 2007 8:31am

The scenario was already provided. You chose to ignore it. - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 9:16am

Evolution explains the changes in whale hearing. - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 6:13am

It's your claim that evolution has been proven, so the burden of proof is yours. - by whoisyourcreator - Aug 27, 2007 8:59pm

Evolution provides the explanation. - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 5:40am

WiYC's burden. - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 5:46am

Different plan of attack? - by whoisyourcreator - Aug 28, 2007 8:23am

Re: Different plan of attack? - by akg41470 - Aug 28, 2007 8:54am

Nope. I explained this to you many times. The burden is on creationists. Evolution is established - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 9:24am

Awesome admission! - by whoisyourcreator - Aug 29, 2007 1:02pm

I think you are mistaken as usual. - by Arneson - Aug 29, 2007 2:55pm

I think you mean sad for creationism. - by Arneson - Aug 29, 2007 3:33pm

Evolution is true because it has met the test. - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 5:57am

WiYC misses forest for the trees. - by Arneson - Aug 27, 2007 11:47am

What an Incredible Admission - by John - Aug 27, 2007 5:32am

Re: What an Incredible Admission - by akg41470 - Aug 27, 2007 11:43am

Critical analysis of evolution only - by whoisyourcreator - Aug 27, 2007 9:29pm

Re: Critical analysis of evolution only - by akg41470 - Aug 28, 2007 7:56am

All the while shielding creationism from scientific scrutiny. - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 10:59am

Don't worry. A better understanding of evolution easily corrects it. - by Arneson - Aug 27, 2007 11:52am

Without proof again - by whoisyourcreator - Aug 27, 2007 12:25pm

Without proof is your gig not mine. - by Arneson - Aug 27, 2007 12:51pm

Horse evolution was not 'refuted'. Eldredge was talking about the need to update an old exhibit. - by Arneson - Aug 27, 2007 8:51am

A better understanding of the evolution of horses. - by Arneson - Aug 27, 2007 9:03am

Re: Enough montificating - Where is your evidence? - by Arneson - Aug 27, 2007 9:11am

Re: Enough montificating - Where is your evidence? - by Arneson - Aug 27, 2007 9:14am

The theory is yours so the burden of proof is yours - 'Nylon-eating' bacteria - by whoisyourcreator - Aug 27, 2007 12:23pm

You really should stop quoting AIG in general and Don Batten in particular. - by Arneson - Aug 27, 2007 12:43pm

Batten's claims were answered specifically and thoroughly. - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 4:20am

You know better - by whoisyourcreator - Aug 27, 2007 9:33pm

You have been given plenty of examples - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 4:30am

Batten was refuted thoroughly, point by point. - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 4:35am

Again, you know better - New deal - by whoisyourcreator - Aug 29, 2007 1:17pm