Again, John, with the personal insults. Let them go. They don't scare me and they make you look defensive.

===
I repeat, evolutionary biology is so useless that it is is simply not being applied anywhere in medicine.
===
Show me where evolution is being applied in medicine. You can't because it isn't.
===
No one has ever applied it to medicine because it has no practical application, period.
===

In study:
http://www.tulane.edu/~bfleury/darwinmed/darwinmed.html

Lectures and programs:
http://science.education.nih.gov/home2.nsf/Featured+Programs/CCA1A19ECF07271C8525716A00597219

A simple explanation (with graphs and charts) showing how/why it's important:
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/_0/medicine_01

You are correct in that I cannot find a current application (I don't have access to the latest medical journals), but it's not because it's invalid as a theory, it's because, like I said, it's a NEW FIELD.

Now John, if you have a problem with evolution being used in medicine by claiming that evolution ITSELF doesn't work...since there's no fossil argument for you to argue with...

Which part of evolution is it you don't like? The natural selection part or the mutation part?

...because both of them can be pretty easily demonstrated in smaller organisms, right before your eyes and in the lab.