Who Is Your Creator message forum

Forum: Who Is Your Creator message forum

This forum is locked and posting is not allowed

Author

Comment

View Entire Thread

Arneson

Aug 28, 2007 - 10:02PM

71.63.223.195

Actually, I think that you just lost it completely.

"But note what your quote and you are suggesting, that the virus is fine-tuning and improving itself to better attack its host. Remember one of the stipulations of evolutionary theory, that any changes in an organism cannot be for a purpose. It all has to be based on chance mutations. I agree with your writer, I think it is obvious that even single-celled organisms have a type of intelligence that enables them to adapt, but this is the kind of artificial thought straight-jacket that evolutionist force on others."

It is not intelligence that allowed this virus to more effectively attack its host. It is natural selection acting upon the variation that is there.

Only a matter of time and a greater degree of change follows. - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 10:06pm

The miracle of time - by whoisyourcreator - Aug 29, 2007 1:11pm

Deep time - by Arneson - Aug 29, 2007 2:22pm

The time it takes... - by akg41470 - Aug 29, 2007 12:29am

Bullpucky! - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 9:53am

Your scorecard shows YOUR leaps of serious illogic. - by Arneson - Aug 27, 2007 11:03am

Dinosaurs Turning into Birds - by John - Aug 27, 2007 2:47pm

Imprecise language... - by Arneson - Aug 27, 2007 3:38pm

The Lore of Evolutionism - by John - Aug 27, 2007 4:15pm

Re: The Lore of Evolutionism - by Brian - Aug 28, 2007 3:03am

Re: Re: The Lore of Evolutionism - by John - Aug 28, 2007 3:17am

There is one point that we can agree on... - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 10:33am

Your point is not proven. - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 3:48am

Birds evolved from theropod dinosaurs. - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 4:15am

No contradiction if you follow the logic and the evidence. - by Arneson - Aug 27, 2007 10:31am

Pakicetus was terrestrial as expected in the first in the transition from land to sea. - by Arneson - Aug 27, 2007 10:52am

Which of Thewissen and Hussain's summary would you go by? 1993 or 2001? - by whoisyourcreator - Aug 27, 2007 9:10pm

The most current that shows terrestrial whale and completes the sequence. - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 9:59am

Thewissen and Hussain explained their 'change of mind'. - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 10:10am

WiYC carefully trims quotes to avoid the obvious whale evolution conclusion from the evidence. - by Arneson - Aug 27, 2007 11:25am

And your proof is where? - by whoisyourcreator - Aug 27, 2007 9:13pm

I think you would find it in the article from which you selectively quoted. - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 10:04am

Ears and foramen. - by Arneson - Aug 27, 2007 11:37am

Give your evidence of fat pad containment and explanation of development - by whoisyourcreator - Aug 27, 2007 12:01pm

Miraculous is your gig not mine. - by Arneson - Aug 27, 2007 12:29pm

Why is it that evolutionists cannot explain how evolution occurs? - by whoisyourcreator - Aug 27, 2007 8:49pm

Why is it WiYC always changes the subject? - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 5:28am

So you admit you are unable to articulate how evolution occurs? - by whoisyourcreator - Aug 28, 2007 8:31am

The scenario was already provided. You chose to ignore it. - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 9:16am

Evolution explains the changes in whale hearing. - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 6:13am

It's your claim that evolution has been proven, so the burden of proof is yours. - by whoisyourcreator - Aug 27, 2007 8:59pm

Evolution provides the explanation. - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 5:40am

WiYC's burden. - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 5:46am

Different plan of attack? - by whoisyourcreator - Aug 28, 2007 8:23am

Re: Different plan of attack? - by akg41470 - Aug 28, 2007 8:54am

Nope. I explained this to you many times. The burden is on creationists. Evolution is established - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 9:24am

Awesome admission! - by whoisyourcreator - Aug 29, 2007 1:02pm

I think you are mistaken as usual. - by Arneson - Aug 29, 2007 2:55pm

I think you mean sad for creationism. - by Arneson - Aug 29, 2007 3:33pm

Evolution is true because it has met the test. - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 5:57am

WiYC misses forest for the trees. - by Arneson - Aug 27, 2007 11:47am

What an Incredible Admission - by John - Aug 27, 2007 5:32am

Re: What an Incredible Admission - by akg41470 - Aug 27, 2007 11:43am

Critical analysis of evolution only - by whoisyourcreator - Aug 27, 2007 9:29pm

Re: Critical analysis of evolution only - by akg41470 - Aug 28, 2007 7:56am

All the while shielding creationism from scientific scrutiny. - by Arneson - Aug 28, 2007 10:59am

Don't worry. A better understanding of evolution easily corrects it. - by Arneson - Aug 27, 2007 11:52am

Without proof again - by whoisyourcreator - Aug 27, 2007 12:25pm

Without proof is your gig not mine. - by Arneson - Aug 27, 2007 12:51pm

Horse evolution was not 'refuted'. Eldredge was talking about the need to update an old exhibit. - by Arneson - Aug 27, 2007 8:51am