"I personally am not qualified to share the details of mutations. What I can do is point you to research that has been done, but I'm imagining you've looked at most of it and made your own alternate conclusion. I've seen the long threads on ambulocetus and others. Even those are over my head in terms of the details. That's a pointless challenge, I'm not going to waste my time, because it's been demonstrated to you time and time again."
1. Since you concede that you are not qualified, we suggest that you summon a ‘professional’ who might help you. Here are some sites that make the same claims that you guys do. Why don’t you post a 'help needed' warrant?
http://forum.darwincentral.org/
(Notice the statement on the top of the page: “Corrupting the World’s Youth Since 1859”) At least they admit it!)
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/
2. As far the whale transition, do you have some new information? You couldn’t quite get the poor guys into the water and we invite everyone to see the folly of the ‘walking whales.’ It is no doubt the most ridiculous yarn that evolutionists have come up with yet.
http://pub17.bravenet.com/forum/1424646898/fetch/710081/23
http://pub17.bravenet.com/forum/1424646898/fetch/709476/25
http://pub17.bravenet.com/forum/1424646898/fetch/709377/26
Wow. I write 1200+ words rebutting your positions and all you can come up with is how unqualified I am to share details about specific mutations? I'll go you one further - I'm not even a professional scientist!
Sorry, but it looks like I need no help. I rebutted 15 points of yours, and all except one to no response.
I wouldn't waste P.Z. Meyers' time asking for his "help". He's got more important things to do. Fortunately, this site is but a blip on the radar, and nobody seems to care about it except for Brian and myself.
Sorry, I believe those ambulocetus posts speak for themselves. I need not add anything further.
1. No where in your 1200+ word 'rebuttal' did you offer any evidence that would make your case.
2. The "Let's See How Evolution Works" forum is for evolutionists to attempt to make their case by offering 'factual' information backed up with empirical evidence.
3. From here on, unless you provide something more than just more rhetoric, I will be deleting you posts.
