Thank you for your inquiry.

1. In regard to your comment:

"I see overwhelming evidence for evolution"

Please share with us just one fact of evolution that is substaintiated by empirical proof/evidence.

2. In regard to your other comment:

"I was wondering about sound hypotheses and evidence for creationism"

This forum (i.e. "The Let's See How Evolution Works" game and forum) is for countering the misconceptions and lies that prop up the theory of evolution.

However, please refer to:
http://www.whoisyourcreator.com/

and note that with using evolutionary criteria, The Genesis Theory of Creationism is more 'naturalistic' than evolution.

"...The Genesis Theory of Creationism is more 'naturalistic' than evolution"

So wait, you're saying that the supernatural is natural?

Evolution doesn't have or use any supernatural explanations, so even in that context what you're saying is a direct contradiction.

The issue is NOT that evolutionists run out of 'naturalistic' explanations for their faith.

The problem is that each explanation does not qualify as being 'naturalistic' when using their own criteria:

http://www.whoisyourcreator.com/scientific_criteria.html