This board welcomes anyone who would like to post empirical scientific evidence for the theory of evolution (in this case, the creation of the universe).
Instead of taking advantage of this great opportunity, they take up our time with first admitting that there are no naturalistic explanations, but then go on to claim that that shouldn't stand in the way of teaching the nonsense anyway!
"You ask for an explanation of what happened before the Big Bang - and you know very well that physics cannot yet explain that - and you claim that if it cannot be explained, well, then the whole theory is bunk and should be thrown out and not be taught or attempted to be understood. This is the very definition of a strawman argument.
Your position seems to be that if something is not 100% explainable and demonstrable by empirical evidence that it should not be taught at all."