What we are trying to tell you is that (A) this point was likely not made well to begin with,(B) appears to have been well used and has at least 2 broken places, (C)is likely a small arrow point for a type ID, And (D) essentialy there is not enough left to be certain of named type identity.
So, if anyone else out there feels that they can positively ID this point type.....by all means GO for it, as with any real certainty, I cannot. About all you can do is look at point type possibles for the area where it was found (range & distribution). Look for arrow point types that appear to have a broad base with flaring corners,...and guess away!
I'll show you some brokes too, at digfest, only I'm
not BRINGING them, I plan to DIG some right there, along with some G-11's . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .